ANOOP V.MOHTA
Sharad Gajanan Ambole – Appellant
Versus
Gauramma Kumarappa Medar – Respondent
The present appeal is by obstructionists nos. 1, 2 and 3 against an order dated 3-9-2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay (the executing Court) in Chamber summons no. 602 of 2007 in civil suit no. 6805/1994 as chamber summons taken out by the decree holder against the obstructionists to the execution of the decree in the judgement has been allowed by further observing that the obstructionists are disentitled to any right and interest in the property.
2. The Plaintiff/decree holder filed the suit against the defendants for eviction and possession. The plaintiff is original tenant of the premises i.e. 10A. The suit was against the judgement debtors by holding them to be the trespassers. The first appeal no. 630/1998 filed by the judgement debtor was dismissed on 11-2-2005 and further the said dismissal was confirmed by the Supreme Court on 18-3-2005. While dismissing the SLP (Special Leave Petition) the original defendants/judgement debtors were given time till 30-9-2005 to vacate the said premises upon filing an usual undertaking within four weeks. The said undertaking was also filed on behalf of all but signed by only one defendant.
3. On 27-9-2005 in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.