S.RADHAKRISHNAN, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Marico Limited – Appellant
Versus
Raj Oil Mills Limited – Respondent
The Appellants/ Original Plaintiffs are the registered proprietor of the designed article, for reference called "Parachute Cap", since 1999. The Respondents’ Application for registration of their cap i.e. for reference called "Cocoraj Cap" was rejected some time in the year 2004.
2. In the month of September, 2006, the cause of action arose, when the Plaintiffs learnt about the use by the Respondents-Defendants of the impugned caps for which they have registered and acquired copyright of the said design.
3. On 8th September, 2006, the Appellants/ Original Plaintiffs vide their Advocate’s letter called upon the Respondents/ Original Defendants to desist from using the impugned caps of which they are the proprietor of registered design bearing No. 181063.
4. On 19th September, 2006, the Defendants vide their Advocate’s letter denied the allegation of the Plaintiffs and claimed to be using the impugned caps since 2002.
5. On 3rd October, 2006, the Plaintiffs vide their Advocate’s letter, once again called upon the Defendants to desist from using the impugned caps for which they are the proprietor of registered design.
6. On 4th October, 2006, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.