SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 79

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Kishor N. Lulla – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.:-

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Appellate authority viz., State of Maharashtra dated 13th June 2007 confirming notice which has been issued on 31st August 2004 and a copy of which is annexed as Exh.D to the petition.

2. The Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation invoked section 56 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (M.R.T.P. Act) and stated therein that the Chief Officer of the erstwhile Municipal Council approved the plan for additions and alterations of Shop No.829 for the purpose of development to the extent of 33.69 sq.mtrs. on 20th January 1972 on each of the floor of ground plus upper floor structure. The report of the Junior Engineer is referred to in the notice and thereafter, it is stated that the petitioner was authorised to use the property to the extent indicated therein. However, the sanctioned development plan came into force with effect from 1st July 1974 and having regard to the said plan, petitioner’s property, more particularly described in the notice, is completely affected by the designated purpose of 35 feet wide road. In such circumstances, hi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top