RANJANA DESAI, R.P.SONDURBALDOTA
Jinu P. Philip – Appellant
Versus
Annie Varghese – Respondent
1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith.
2. The appellant is the original respondent-husband and the respondent is the original petitioner-wife in Petition No.A-361 of 2007, which was filed in the Family Court No.3, Pune at Pune. For the sake of convenience, we shall refer to them as the appellanthusband and the respondent-wife.
3. A petition was filed by the respondent-wife for restitution of conjugal rights under section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (for short, “the said Act”). The case of the respondent-wife was that she and the appellant-husband were married on 11/12/2003 at Pune under the provisions of the said Act. Both the parties are Christians by religion. It was a love marriage. The appellanthusband had not informed about this marriage to his parents. It is the case of the respondent-wife that notice of the marriage was given in September, 2003. After the marriage, which took place on 11/12/2003, the appellant-husband left the respondent-wife at Lonavla. He went to Dubai on 14/12/2003. He told the respondent-wife that after he would get a job, he would arrange for her Vis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.