SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 606

V.R.KINGAONKAR
Latifkan Karamkhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
Vijay Shanna, for petitioner.
B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P., for respondent No. 1 -State. J.R. Shaikh, for respondents Nos. 2 & 3.

KINGAONKAR V.R., J.: - Original complainant impugns bail order dated 12th December, 2007 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, on bail application (Criminal BA No. 1112 of 2007).

2. By the impugned order, learned Additional Sessions Judge granted bail application of respondents Nos. 2 and 3 and directed them to be released on furnishing bail bonds in sum of Rs. 25,000/- each with one surety and on the certain conditions.

3. Undisputedly, deceased Jarinabi was married to respondent No. 2 – Shaikh Nasiroddin on 23rd April, 2006 as per the tenets of the Mohammedan law. After the marriage, Jarinabi started living with the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 at their residence Respondent No. 2 Nasiroddin is a Police Constable attached to Constabulary at Jalgaon. Jalgaori is about 28 kilometres from Bhusawal. It is about 30 minutes journey from Bhusawal to Jalgaon.

4. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that after one month of the marriage, deceased Jarinabi was ill-treated and harassed by the respondents Nos. 2 and 3. They used to tease her by saying that she was not knowing domestic work, her father gave less dowry and used to beat her. She used to complain about the ill - trea
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top