C.L.PANGARKAR
Hanuman Deosthan – Appellant
Versus
Jaiwant Wasudeo Pullarwar – Respondent
This Second Appeal is at the instance of original plaintiffs. The suit was initially decreed by the trial Court but was dismissed by the first appellate Court. The appellants and the respondents shall hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.
2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are as follows:
There is a trust known as Hanuman Deosthan in Navi Shukrawari at Nagpur. One Bansilal Teli was the disciple of Haridas Baba. Haridasbaba took Samadhi some 70 years ago. The said Saint had a Math in house No. 873 Circle No.3 at Nagpur. The Padukas (Foot Print) of the said Baba were installed in the said building and the Pooja was being offered there. The said Bansilal was the Chief Wahiwatdar of this Math. Before his death in 1944 he asked his wife Yashoda to look after and manage the Math. Since he had grown old he had also directed that she should appoint a Panch Committee to manage the affairs of the said Math, she remaining one of the trustees. In 1946 Yashoda executed a document and registered it by which a Panch Committee came to be appointed. Some 5 Panchas were appointed besides Yashoda. All 5 Panchas except Ramjiwan Kaluaram are now dead. Thereafter one Baba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.