SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 469

C.L.PANGARKAR
Prabhakar s/o Shankar Nikam – Appellant
Versus
Satyabhama w/o Prabhakar Nikam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.P.B.Patil, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr.H.R.Dhumale, Advocate for the respondent.

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1. This is an appeal by the original petitioner, who had filed a petition for divorce. Second Appeal no.351 of 1998.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as under –

The appellant/petitioner was married to the respondent on 24/5/1983. They have a son by name Vivek who is in the custody of the respondent. After the marriage, the respondent had come to reside with the appellant/petitioner. While respondent was living with the appellant, he did not give any reason to make any grievance against him. He submits that respondent, however, was not desirous of leading happy life with the appellant. She was in the habit of going back to her parents off and on without any reason. She was also in the habit of picking up quarrels. She was behaving in arrogant manner and used to insult the elderly persons in the family. The respondent met with an accident in the year 1989. She was given immediately medical treatment for the same. After she recovered, she went to her parents house. Since then she did not come back. The appellant tried to bring the respondent back to his house. Appellant submits that the respondent has treated him with cruelty and has, without any reason, with











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top