SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 862

N.A.BRITTO
Chico Ursula DSouza – Appellant
Versus
Goa Plast Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A.F. DINIZ, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. SUDESH USGAONKAR, Advocate for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT:- These revisions are filed by the accused who has been convicted and sentenced under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('Act', for short) and whose convictions and sentences have been upheld by the learned Session Judges.

2. Since the facts involved are almost common, by consent of Counsel they are being disposed of by this common judgment. The cases from which these revisions arise, pertain to the cheques of different dates given by the accused, with letter dated 20/07/1992. The accused was the Managing Director of the Complainant which is a registered company. The details of the said cheques are as follows:

Cheque No. Date Amount Cnmmal Revision No. Case No.

Before JMFC

0160171 10/01/1993 40,000/- Decided by S.C. 1 49/2003

2004 (2) SCC 235

0160112 10/04/1993 40,000/- Crir No.9/2008 150/1993

0160173 10/08/1993 40,000/- Crir No.7/2008 372/1993

0160174 10/12/1993 40,000/- Crir NO.8/2008 10/1994

0160175 10/04/1994 40,000/- Crir No.5/2008 37/1994

0160176 10/08/1994 40,000/- Crir No.4/2008 5/1995

0160177 10/12/1994 40,000/- Crir No.4/2007 66/1995

0160178 10/04/1995 40,000/- Crir No.4/2007 66/1995

0160179 10











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top