SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 1421

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
P.V.HARDAS & P.R.BORKAR, JJ.
Munna @ Shivdas s/o Kumaran Kolenjeri- Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2006.
Decided On: 30.9.2008

Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.A.Karnik, advocate for the appellant
Mrs.R.R.Mane, A.P.P. for the respondent

Headnote:Penal Code, 1860 - Section 300-Injuries sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death.-The injuries sustained were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. Particularly injury No. 4 was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death as it had caused internal injuries to vital organs. So case comes on both Clauses Firstly and Thirdly of Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code. The case does not fall under any of the Exceptions contained in Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code.

       Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3, 8, 9 and 22 - Conviction under Section 302 - Plea that murder occurred due to grave and sudden provocation - Conviction on basis of dying declaration made of certificate of doctor - Dying declaration corroborated by other witness - Held - Present case does not fall within category of grave and sudden provocation - Conviction proper. - The dying declaration of deceased Ganesh is corroborated by evidence of 3 eye-witnesses.

       There was no motive to commit the murder. However the number of injuries inflicted with deadly weapon like knife and the vital parts of the body on which the injuries were inflicted clearly show that the appellant did intend to cause death. Moreover, doctor has stated that the injuries sustained were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. So case comes both clause Firstly and Thirdly of Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code. The case does not fall under any of the exceptions contained in Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code.

       

ORAL JUDGMENT:

P.R.BORKAR,J.

1. Appellant Munna @ Shivdas has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur in Sessions Case No. 29 of 2004 decided on 7.2.2006, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default to undergo R.I. for 3 months.

2. Briefly stated, it is prosecution case that deceased Ganesh Kisan Pawal was working as a salesman in the shop of Chandrakant Darade (pw9) at Shinganapur, where there is famous Shani temple. Deceased Ganesh used to work from 8.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m. He was residing at Vanjarwadi with his mother Mandabai, father and sister. On 27.4.2004 the deceased Ganesh attended his work at the shop of Chandrakant Darade (pw9) from morning. At 2.00 p.m. Chandrakant Darade (pw9) went to Vanjarwadi. Ganesh took meals. Since there was no customer, he went to sleep. At about 2.30 p.m. the appellant who was son of the owner of Shani Mahatma Lodge and Hotel, came to the place where deceased Ganesh was sleeping and while Ganesh was asleep, he gave slap on the cheek of Ganesh. Ganesh got up and he also retaliated by giving a slap to appellant Munna and questioned for slapping him. Appellant Munna asked why he did not pay the outstanding dues of the hotel. There was exchange of words and appellant Munna took out a knife and inflicted blows on the abdomen, back and other parts of the body of Ganesh. This was seen by Dnyaneshwar Kardile (pw3), Vishnu Bhumkar (pw2) and Akbar Shaikh (pw4) as they came hearing the quarrel. Thereafter appellant ran away. Chandrakant Darade (pw9) was called. He along with others took Ganesh to the hospital of Dr. Atul Khalkar (pw13) at Ahmednagar in an ambulance. While Ganesh was being treated, P.S.I. Jadhav arrived there and recorded the complaint as given by Ganesh which was treated as the first information report. Ganesh died in the hospital on 29.4.2004 at about 3.35 p.m. Thereafter his dead body was taken to the Civil Hospital where Dr. Munot (pw10) performed postmortem.

3. In the mean time, A.S.I. Tawale (pw14) who was posted on Bandobast duty at Shinganapur learnt about the incident. He arrested the present appellant. Subsequently the appellant discovered the knife that was used by him. P.S.I. Jadhav (pw17) conducted the investigation.

4. Dr.Atul Khalkar (pw13) examined at Exh.46 stated that on 27.4.2004 at about 5.45 p.m. deceased Ganesh was brought to his hospital in an injured state and he examined him and found following injuries :

(1) Incised wound on middle of the back lateral to T-11 to T-12 vertebra on left side. 2 x 3 c.m. deep upto transverse process of vertebra.

(2) Incised wound posterior to illac crest x 2 x 3 c.m. bone deep.

(3) Incised wounds over sacro iliac joint 2 x 3 c.m. bone deep.

(4) Incised wound on left hypochondria at sub posterior margins 2 x 3 c.m. going to abdominal cavity.

(5) Incised wound post axillary line 2 x 3 c.m. not entered into thoracic cavity.

(6) Incised wound over knee joint 2 x 4 c.m. joint deep.

(7) Incised wound elbow joint 1 x 2 cm. superficial.

On internal examination the doctor found injury no. 1 with fracture of transverse processes of vertebra. Injury nos. 2, 3 and 5 found to be internally muscle cut. From Injury no. 4 parts of the intestine were found to be coming out. Injury no. 1 and 4 were grievous injuries. So far as injury no. 4 is concerned it had cut stomach 2 x 3 c.m. and liver 4 x 2 c.m.

5. Dr. Khalkar further stated that at about 6.00 p.m. police came and asked whether they could record statement of Ganesh. Dr.Khalkar examined Ganesh. Ganesh was conscious and oriented about time and place. Accordingly Dr. Khalkar made endorsement that patient was conscious and oriented in time and place. Thereafter statement of Ganesh was recorded by P.S.I. Jadhav of Sonai police station. The doctor stated that he






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top