1. In both these petitions under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the judgment and order dated 25.09.2006 and 19.02.1999 passed by Presiding Officer, University and College Tribunal, Nagpur.

2. In writ petition No. 812/2007 by an order dated 01-02/04/2007, the learned Single Judge has passed the order, which is reproduced as under:- .The Division Bench of this High Court (Coram:- R. M. Lodha and R. S. Mohite, JJ) ini W. P. No. 1983/2003; Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey (SNDT) Women's University & Anr. ..vs.. Dr. (Mrs.) Nita S. Dodd & Ors. has held that the order passed by the University and College Tribunal is covered by Clause (40) of Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules and amenable to the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge. However, the another Division Bench of this High Court (Coram:- B. H. Marlapalle & J. H. Bhatia, JJ) in Civil Writ Petition No. 2011/2006; Prof. Shashikant B. Kulkarni ..Vs.. The Principal, BPCS College of Physical Education, Mumbai & Ors. in para No. 2 held as follows:- .At the threshold, Mr. Anturkar submitted that the petition would lie before the Single Bench. Admittedly