SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 1574

N.A.BRITTO
Raghuvir Dessai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Arun Bras Se Sa, for Appellant; Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Public Prosecutor, for Respondent.

Judgment

This appeal is by the accused who has been convicted and sentenced under Section 342 and 376(2)(f), IPC by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Margo.

2. The accused was a watchman of a Government School known as Sahakari Pratnik Vidhlaya situated at Molcornem within the jurisdiction of Quepem Police Station of which Shaikh Ismail/P.W.7 was the Head-master. The said school was being run in two sessions. The secondary section was run in the morning session, whilst the primary section was run in the evening session of which Channama Patel/P.W. 4 and Chitra Gaonkar/P.W. 13 were the primary teachers. The victim/P.W. 11, Ramesh/P.W. 12. Swapnil Kerkar/P.W.9 and Sonali Gaonkar/P.W. 10 were the students of the said primary section. Yeshwant Bhile/P.W. 14 was the Peon of the said school.

3. The accused was charged and tried with an allegation that on 6-8-2003 at about 13.30 hours the accused wrongfully confined the victim/P.W. 11, who at the relevant time was 8 years old and studying tin the third standard, and committed rape upon her. The case of the accused was one of denial simpliciter.

4. From the facts stated by the victim/P.W. 11 and her mother Smt. Ujwala Parmar/P.W.1 it trans













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top