S.B.DESHMUKH
Govindrao Shankarrao Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Rukminibai w/o. Vithal Reddy – Respondent
Heard learned counsel Mr. S. M. Vibhute Advocate, h/f. Mr. V. C. Solshe, Advocate for the appellant. Also heard learned A.G.P. Mr. J. S. Gavhane. The State of Maharashtra or its officers are not party to this second appeal. This matter was listed before this court for hearing on 6th of August, 2008. That day I heard learned counsel for the appellant wherein the learned counsel for appellant had invited my attention to Exh.5 i.e. Hissa form No.4 (Copy of Gunakar Book). On my query, the learned counsel for appellant informed me on that day that survey manual is not available with the High Court Bar Association, Aurangabad, Bench at Aurangabad.
In this premise help of learned A.G.P. Mr. J. S. Gavhane was sought. He was requested to produce on record the format of Hissa Form No.12, Hissa Form No.11 and Circular issued by the Settlement Commissioner, Pune on 24th of June, 1940. Hearing of the appeal was adjourned. That is why this second appeal is today listed for admission the learned A.G.P. Mr. J. S. Gavhani has made available circular issued by the Settlement Commissioner on 24th June, 1940 and format of Hissa form No.4, Hissa form No.11 and Hissa form No.12. All these docu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.