SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 231

S.S.SHINDE
Ajit – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Applicant :V.J. Dixit, Sr. Counsel, L.V. Sangit, N.H.Borade, A.P.P., P.P. Chavan, Advocates.

Judgment :

1. Rule, returnable forthwith.

This application is filed for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.259/2008 registered at Chalisgaon Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B, 34 of I.P.C. on 6th December, 2008.

2. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was arrested in connection with another crime and he was subsequently released on bail. It is further submitted that just to harass the applicant, he is shown as accused in different crimes. It is further submitted that the report of the auditor is the same. However, different crimes are registered. The action is malafide. It is further submitted that the applicant is heart patient. he is from rival political party. Therefore, police are harassing the applicant. In the complaint main allegations are against the directors. It is further submitted that the present applicant has deposited Rs.20 lacs in Crime No.216/2008. It is further submitted that at the most non depositing the amount would attract civil liability. It is further submitted that the alleged offence against the present applicant is only in respect of app




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top