B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Laxmikant Sunderlalji Chandak – Respondent
Union of India and General Manager, South Eastern Railway have filed these appeals under Section 23(1) of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act. 1987. The challenge therein is to common order dated 303-1993 delivered by the Railway Claims Tribunal. Nagpur Bench in Claim Application Nos.191 of 1991 to 196 of 1991. Claim Application Nos.238 of 1991 and 240 of 1991. It is to be noted that the dispute in Claim Application Nos.191 to 196 of 1991 pertains to non delivery while dispute in Claim Application Nos.238 and 240 of 1991 is in relation to short delivery of nine bags and 23 bags of incense sticks. Those Claim Applications were filed by present respondent pointing out that those consignments were booked in his favour by S.K. Enterprises. Himgir. District-Sundergarh (Orissa) and as he did not receive the consignment or then as there was short delivery, after serving the statutory notice as required by Section 78-B of the Indian Railway Act. 1890. (here in after referred to as the Act), he filed the Claim Applications. The booking dates are 9-11-1989 in Claim Application Nos.191. 192. 193 and 195/1991. 12-08-1989 in Claim Application No.196. 238-1989 in Claim Application No.240/1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.