PADHYE
Dadasaheb Bapusaheb Naik and etc. , – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :- The above referred three appellants in three different appeals as original accused Nos. 1, 2 and 4 respectively and acquitted accused Madhukar Vithal Patekar were tried in Special Case No. 2 of 1977 in the Court of the Special Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences punishable under (1) Section 120-B I.P.C. and (2) Sec. 420 read with Sec. 120-B I.P.C. In addition to the above charges, which were framed against all the accused, original accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3, who were officers from various departments working under the Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, and the Panchayat Samiti, Parner, were further charged for offences punishable under Sec. 477-A read with Sec. 120-B I.P.C. and Sec. 5(2) read with Sec. 5(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act and further read with Sec. 120-B, I.P.C. Alternatively, a charge for substantive offences punishable under Secs. 420 and 477-A read with Sec. 109 and/or S.34, I.P.C. was also framed against all the four accused. The learned Special Judge, while acquitting original accused No. 3 Madhukar Vithal Patekar, who was Extension Officer (Works) working under the Panchayat Samiti, Parner, of all the offences charged and while acquitting the first
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.