N.V.DABHOLKAR, P.R.BORKAR
Mohd. Abdul Rasheed S/o. Mohd. Abdul Razzak – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Charity Commissioner, Aurangabad – Respondent
Whether as against interim order of suspension passed under Section 41 - D(3) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. 1950, an application to District Court and against order of District Court in such application, an appeal to High Court are tenable?
2. In Second Appeal No.824 of 2006 the learned Judge has expressed vie\v that application to District Court or an Appeal to this court are not tenable against interim order passed under Section 41-D(3) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. 1950 (hereinafter referred to. "the Act of 1950"); whereas in Writ Petition No. 656 of 1999 view is expressed by the learned Judge (Coram: B. H. Marlapalle. J.) that such application to District Court and an appeal to High Court are tenable.
3. Before we proceed to the arguments advanced before us, we may reproduce Section 41- D of the Act of 1950 for ready reference. It is as follows:-
"41D. Suspension, removal and dismissal of trustee:
(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.