Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.

1. Rule. The respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing and disposal forthwith.

2. Petitioner 1 is a proprietary concern, having its registered office at 6/8, Old Hanuman Lane, 1st Cross Lane, 1st floor, Room No.19, Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai – 400 002. Petitioner 2 is the proprietor of petitioner 1. Respondent 1 is the Administrator of Administration of Dadra & Nagar Havli (U.T.), Electricity Department, Silvassa. Respondent 1 is the appellate authority under the Electricity Act, 2003. Respondent 2 is the Executive Engineer of the Electricity Department, Dadra & Nagar Haveli (U.T.). Respondents 3 to 5 are the Deputy Engineers and Junior Engineer respectively of Respondent 1. Respondent 6 is the Union of India.

3. Petitioner 1 is in the business, inter alia, of manufacturing and supplying of various types of polyesters and yarns. Petitioner 1 has various types of machineries and equipments in the factory premises. By demand notice dated 3/10/2007, respondent 2 informed the petitioners that the CT ratio of their metering installation was changed from 25/5 to 50/5 vide office report dated 11/7/2003. The demand not