C.L.PANGARKAR
Kawadu – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent
Oral Judgment:
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) Chandrapur on an application (Exh.100).
3. The facts are as follows -
The respondents/plaintiffs have instituted a suit for declaration, partition and separate possession. The petitioners/defendants had filed a list of witnesses in the said proceeding by way of defence. The evidence of the plaintiffs is recorded and they have been cross-examined by the defendants. The defendant's affidavit has been filed on record, but has not as yet been examined.
4. The plaintiffs moved an application (Exh.100) before the court praying that it should direct the defendants to file affidavit of all the witnesses on record at a time. This application was opposed by the defendants. In spite of the opposition of the defendants, the learned judge of the trial court granted the application and the defendants feel aggrieved by the same.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants submits that there is nothing in the Rule 4 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.