NISHITA MHATRE
Vinayak Chintamani Agashe – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. The respondent No.4 which is a proprietary concern, availed of the cash credit facility from respondent No.3 Bank. The petitioner and respondent No.5 agreed to be the guarantors for the loan obtained by the respondent No.4 from the Bank. The loan sanctioned by the Bank was to the tune of Rs.5 lacs and the interest rate payable was 18% per annum. Various documents were executed in order to process the loan. These documents included a demand promissory note, cash credit agreement, letter of continuity, letter of hypothecation and the guarantee bond executed by the petitioner and respondent No.5.
3. The borrower i.e. respondent No.4 herein defaulted in repaying the loan. A notice dated 26.12.1987 was issued by the Bank to the borrower with a copy to the guarantors, demanding payme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.