N.A.BRITTO
Provident Fund Inspector, Himesh Ranjan Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Anderson Marine Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
2. I have heard Shri. R. Rao, learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondents/Accused.
3. Respondent No.1 -Company along with its Managing Director, Respondent No.2, and so also the other Directors were prosecuted by the said Complainant for having committed the aforesaid offences. However, leave to appeal was restricted only to Respondent No.1 Company and its Managing Director Respondent No.2.
4. The case of the Complainant as can be seen from paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of each of the complaints was that the accused were required to pay the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Contributions and Administrative Charges for every month within fifteen days of the close of that month in respect of the employees of the said establishment and that in spite of several reques
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.