HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.H. MARLAPALLE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR
Rahul Ulhas Pise & Others - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.231 of 1988 Along With Criminal Appeal No.232 of 1988 Along With Criminal Appeal No.630 of 1988 Along With Criminal Revision Application No.249 of 1988
Date of Judgment : 03-08-2009
INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Section 323 and 326 - Assault. - Where intention of accused is not to cause death of any complainant in such case they can be convicted under Sections 323, 326 of IPC.
B.H. Marlapalle, J.
1. These three appeals and the Criminal Revision Application arise from the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Kolhapur on 21/3/1988 in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1986. The operative part of the order of conviction and sentence reads as under:-
“The accused Nos.1 to 4 are convicted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, Section 326 read with Sections 149, Section 323 read with Section 149 of I.P.C.
1. The accused Nos.1 to 4 are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- i/d to suffer R.I. for 15 days for the offence under Section 147 of I.P.C.
2. The accused Nos. 1 to 4 are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- i/d to suffer R.I. for three months for the offence u/s 148 of
I.P.C.
3. The accused Nos.1 to 4 are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- i/d to suffer R.I. for 6 months for the offence u/s 326 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. for causing grievous hurt to deceased Laxman Pise and Sharad Pise.
4. The accused Nos. 1 to 4 are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- i/d to suffer R.I. for three months under Section 323 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. for causing hurts to deceased Laxman Pise, Sharad Pise and Pradip Pise.
5. The substantive sentences of accused nos. 1 to 4 to run concurrently.
Accused No.1 was in custody from 29.10.85 to 2.11.85.
Accused No.2 was in custody from 26.10.85 to 29.10.85.
Accused No.3 was in custody from 29.10.85 to 2.11.85.
Accused No.4 was in custody from 29.10.85 to 2.11.85.
and they are entitled to the set off of the said period under Section 428 of Cr.P.C.
6. The accused Nos.1 to 4 are acquitted of the offences under Sections 302 read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 of I.P.C.
7. Accused Nos.5 and 6 are acquitted of the offences for which they are charged and prosecuted.
8. The amount of fine if recovered, out of the said amount, amount of Rs.4000/- be awarded to injured Sharad Pise under Section 357 of Cr.P.C.”
2. Criminal Appeal No. 231 of 1988 has been filed by accused nos.1 and 2 and Criminal Appeal No. 232 of 1988 has been filed by accused nos. 3 and 4. Whereas Criminal Appeal No. 630 of 1988 has been filed by the State Government against the acquittal of accused nos.1 to 4 for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. Criminal Revision Application No. 249 of 1988 has been filed by the original complainant – Shri Pradip Laxmanrao Pise (PW 19) praying for setting aside the acquittal order under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. and also the acquittal of accused nos.5 and 6 from all the offences. Hence, all the three appeals and the Criminal Revision Application are being decided by this common judgment.
.During the pendency of these appeals accused no. 2 Dhondiram died and hence Criminal Appeal No.231 of 1988 and Criminal Appeal No.630 of 1988 stand abated qua the said accused and, therefore we will have to examine the appeals only in respect of accused nos.1, 3 and 4.
3. Deceased – Laxman Pise was the younger brother of accused no.2 – Dhondiram. Dhondiarm’s son Ulhas died in 1984 and left behind two sons i.e. Rahul – accused no.1 and Girish – Juvenile acquitted accused. Thus, Ulhas and Girish are the grand children of accused no.2 – Dhondiram. There was a family partnership business of Hotel and Restaurant and the brothers had other immoveable properties at Kolhapur as well as Panhala and disputes about the property and the share of the brothers were going on. By filing proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. one of the parties was successful in obtaining the possession of Meghadoot Hotel, Kolhapur. The brothers also possessed agricultural land at village Nigawe and Kerle. The hotels at Kolhapur and Pan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.