SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Bom) 1043

D.G.KARNIK
Pandurang Chandrabhan Bauche – Appellant
Versus
Jalindhar Sarandhar Tupe – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Mr. Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa for the Appellants
None present for the Respondents

JUDGMENT:-

1. Heard.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.10.2005 passed by the III adhoc Additional District Judge dismissing first appeal (Regular Civil Appeal no. 377 of 2003) filed by the appellants.

3. The respondents are adjoining land owners. The respondents filed an application against the appellants before the Mamlatdar (Tahsildar) under section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for short the Code). Respondents claimed a right of way over the bandh/boundary of the property. Sub section 2 of section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code empowers the Tahsildar to pass an order granting access having regard to the needs of the cultivators for the reasonable access to their fields. After considering the necessity of having a reasonable access to the respondents to their field the Tahsildar passed an order granting way over the bandh by his order dated 9.2.2000. Aggrieved appellants filed a suit, bearing Regular Civil Suit no. 187 of 2000, for setting aside the order of the Tahsildar. By an order dated 31.10.2003 the trial Court dismissed the suit. The lower appellate Court dismissed the appeal by an order dated 21.10.2005. That judgm



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top