SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 180

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Rajashree Shrinivas Joshi – Appellant
Versus
OMEGA information Systems – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:A.M. Kulkarni, Advocate. For the Respondents:
S.S. Patwardhan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The petitioners/judgment debtors in Writ Petition No.3429/2005 have challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 4.2.2005 passed by the learned IInd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur below Exhibits 22 and 23 in Special Darkhast No.53/2004 filed by the respondents/decree holders. It is by this impugned judgment and order, that the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur is competent and has jurisdiction to proceed with the execution of the Award passed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the Arbitration Act") and thereby rejected the objection raised by the judgment debtors as their application under Order 21, Rule 47 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) was also pending for consideration.

2. In Writ Petition No.3158/2003 the above petitioners/judgment debtors have challenged the impugned order dated 4.3.2003 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli below Exhibits 97 and 101 in Special Darkhast No.44/2002 filed by the respondents/decree holders. By this impugned order, the Court has directed the petitioner (judgment debtor no.2) to furnish the Bank Guarantee of Rs.12,24,929/- and further observed to decide



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top