This revision is preferred by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree passed by Civil Judge whereby she dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.

2. The facts are as follows :

The plaintiff No.1 was engaged by the defendants as a sacristan and the plaintiff No. 2 as his assistant. They were the employees of the defendants. They came to be appointed in the year 1976. The defendant No. 1 is the head and administrator of the defendant No.2. The plaintiffs were working under the control and supervision of the defendant No.1. The plaintiffs were to assist the priest in the Church during the religious services and administration of sacraments. The plaintiff No. 2 was also required to do clerical work in connection with the function of the said Church. At times, the plaintiffs were required to work during night hours also. As a result of this, the defendants provided one room to the plaintiffs. The said room has a separate entrance and separate bathroom. The said room was in exclusive possession of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had stored their belongings in the said room. Some disputes arose between the plaintiffs and the def