R.Y.GANOO
Ashok Ghanshyam Kamble – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Oral Judgment:
1. Respondents No. 2 and 3 are facing trial under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act being Special Case No. 4 of 2005 before the learned Special Judge for C. B. I. at Akola.
2. It is noticed that some evidence came to be recorded in the said case and original accused No. 2 i.e. respondent No. 3 filed an application at Exh. 90 before the learned Special Judge praying that the present petitioner should be joined as accused on the basis of evidence which was then before the learned Special Judge. That application was heard by the learned Special Judge on merits. Opportunity was given to the present applicant to advance his submission in connection with the prayer set out in Exh. 90. The learned Special Judge at Akola by his order dated 07/12/2007 granted the request of joining the present applicant as accused No. 3 and certain other orders were passed. This order dated 07/12/2007 is challenged in this petition.
3. I have heard learned Advocates on both sides. It was sought to be argued in principle by the learned Advocate for the applicant that provisions of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should have been i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.