C.L.PANGARKAR
Pradipsingh Ujagarsingh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Wardha – Respondent
ORAL JUDGMENT:
1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of the parties.
2. This writ petition challenges the order passed by the Collector on 14/10/2008, whereby he registered Aghadi of respondent no.3 in which he included the names of respondents no.4 and 5.
3. The facts giving rise to this petition are as follows The elections of Wardha Municipal council were held on 19/11/2006. The result of the said elections were declared on 27/11/2006. The petitioner applied under Section 63(2B) for registration of Aghadi which is known as Sonia Wardha Shahar Vikas Aghadi,. He submitted an application to the Collector under his signature and with resolution passed by the eleven members in his Aghadi, to form a Aghadi. After the said application was filed on 26/12/2006, the Collector passed an order thereon on 13/12/2007 registering the said Aghadi. The said Aghadi was also notified in the official gazette dated 15th December, 2007. Respondent no.1 had also applied for registration of his Aghadi under the name and style Wardha Shahar Vikas Munch. The said application came to be rejected on the ground that it was barred by limitation. Respondent no.3, therefo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.