SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1557

C.L.PANGARKAR
Karishnarao Kanhaiya Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Jeevraj Bhairavlal Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:R.L. Khapre, Advocate. For the Respondent:
S.V. Manohar, Advocate.

Judgment :

Oral Judgment:

By this Writ Petition the petitioners challenge the orders passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner and Joint Charity Commissioner whereby Change Report No. 984 of 1995 was rejected.

2. The facts giving rise to the Writ Petition are as follows:

The story begins with an action in contempt against Ganpat Joshi, Mahadeo Harde, Shashikant Sathe and P. B. Berad in Contempt Petition no. 52 of 1994. This Court on 13.12.1994 directed the Deputy Charity Commissioner to remove Ganpat Joshi, Mahadeo Harade and Shashikant Sathe from the trusteeship. Accordingly in enquiry Deputy Charity Commissioner passed an order on 19.01.1995 removing these three persons from trusteeship. A Change Report No. 316 of 1995 was filed on 31.01.1995 alleging that elections were held on 08.01.1995 and therefore change has occurred. This change was filed by one Arvind Joshi. This change report was rejected on 20.04.1995 and adhoc committee was directed to continued to manage the trust by order dated 12.03.1995. The adhoc committee was reconstituted by appointing D. R. Lohia, Ramesh Sawal, M. B. Nanoti, Lakhichand Dhoble and Kisangopal Gandhi. This Committee was directed to hold elections


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top