B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
New Laxmi Cycle Company A Partnership firm, through its partner Shri Gokuldas Govardhandas Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Jagdishchandra S/o Amrutlal Vakharia – Respondent
Oral Judgment:
The petitioner tenant before this Court is challenging the judgment dated 18/2/2005, delivered by the learned 5th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola in Regular Civil Appeal No. 190 of 2003 and prays for dismissal of Regular Civil Suit No.589 of 2001 filed by respondent-landlord before the Civil Judge, Senior Judge, Akola. In that suit, eviction of the petitioner and possession was sought under Section 15 & 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The 2nd Civil Judge, Junior Division, Akola on 02/5/2003 decreed the suit partly and directed the Petitioner-tenant to handover the possession within two months. It decreed the suit only on the ground that his bona fide need was proved by the respondent-landlord.
2. In Regular Civil Appeal No.190/2003, filed by the present petitioner, a cross-objection or Counter appeal was filed by the landlord seeking entire relief as per plaint prayers. The learned 5th Ad-hoc Additional District Judge, Akola, found that the landlord proved that the tenant was in arrears of rent, plus, taxes and permitted increase and interest, totaling to Rs.9,471/-, but held that, said issue was partly proved. If further held that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.