SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1211

S.S.SHINDE
Anil s/o Vishwanath Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj s/o Indrajeet Bassi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:N.V. Gavare, Advocate. For the Respondent:N.C. Garud, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. The petition is taken up for final hearing immediately.

2. This petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 25.11.2008 passed by the learned C.J.S.D. Shrigonda, below Exh.26 in R.C.S. No. 296 of 2001, thereby rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of written statement.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that on 31.10.2001, the respondent herein, who is original plaintiff instituted R.C.S. No. 296 of 2001 for mandatory injunction that the construction of the respondent in the suit property i.e. Gat No. 26/01 (old Gat No. 26) be demolished and the possession of the open plot be delivered to the petitioner.

On 13.9.2002, the petitioner filed written statement below Exh. 14 denying the contentions raised by the respondent contending that the petitioner owns and possesses 32 Are land in Gat No.25 towards the south east corner. It is also contended that the petitioner carries on business of hotel in the said land since last ten years. It is further contended that the petitioner has never raised any construction over the suit property and has prayed for dismissal of the suit.

On 10.10.2008, the present pe



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top