New India Assurance vs Shweta Dilip Mehta

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:Tejpal S. Ingale, Advocate. For the Respondents:

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Section 168-Determination of compensation-Perfect or exact compensation is not possible-While determining compensation some amount of hypothesis is necessary-Tribunal has discretion to award appropriate compensation to the claimant-Loss of future income as a head of compensation, applies to all persons, irrespective of whether they are earning or not. (Paras 4, 14 and 23)

Judgment :-

P.C.

Called for speaking to the Minutes of the Judgment reserved on 5th December 2009 and pronounced on 14th December 2009.

2. Add the following as the first line in the appearance:

“Mr. Tejpal S. Ingale, for Appellant in First Appeal No. 1262 of 2008.”

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :