B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Chandrakant s/o Gajananrao Pise – Appellant
Versus
Collector, having its office at Civil Lines – Respondent
The petitioners – the elected Councilors of Respondent No. 2 Municipal Council, Saoner, challenge the order dated 7/9/2009 passed by the Respondent No.1 Collector, Nagpur in Petition No. 4/2009 under Rule 6 of the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 (1987 Rules hereafter) in this writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. These 1987 Rules are framed under the Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1987 (1987 Act hereafter). It is not in dispute that Respondent No.2 is local authority constituted under Maharashtra Municipalities, Nagar Panchayats & Industrial Townships Act, 1965.
2. Respondents No. 3 & 4 before this Court filed a reference application viz. petition under Rule 6 of 1987 Rules for declaration that the present Petitioners are disqualified under Section 3 of 1987 Act and can not continue as Councilors of Respondent No. 2 Municipal Council. Petitioners filed an application under Rule 7 (2) of the 1987 Rules contending that the application as filed did not fulfill requirements of Rule 6 & 7 thereof. By order dated 7/9/2009 the Respondent No. 2 Collector rejected it. Collector found that ap
Dr. Mahachandra Prasad Singh v. Chairman
Mirza Kadir Baig vs. District Collector
Sadashiv H. Patil vs. Vithal D. Teke 2001 (1) Mh.L.J. 312 (SC) = AIR 2000 S.C. 3044
Vishin N. Khanchandani and another v. Vidya Lachmandas Khanchandani and another AIR 2000 SC 2747
Kihoto Hollohan case 1992 (Supp) 2 SCC 651 = AIR 1993 SC 412
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.