ORAL JUDGMENT:

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final hearing.

2. These four writ petitions are filed by original complainant Mahendra Kanhaiyyalal Jain being aggrieved by the decisions of Sessions Judge dated 05.03.2008 in Criminal Revision Application Nos. 187, 185, 186 and 188 of 2009 respectively, whereby he allowed the Revision Applications and set aside the order of issuance of process passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalgaon, on 15.04.2008, in R.C.C. Nos. 179, 177, 178 & 180 respectively, thereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate issued processes against the respondents other than the State of Maharashtra, for committing offences punishable under sections 465, 467, 471 & 474 all read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (“I.P.C.”).

3. Some of the facts regarding which there was no more dispute before me are that the complainant was member of Shri Mahavir Urban Cooperative Society Limited, Jalgaon (hereinafter referred to as “credit society”). The credit society is doing banking business at Jalgaon. Respondent Suresh Jain was President (Chairman)