SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 1254

In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.L. PANGARKAR
Shankar @ Vishwambhar s/o Kacchiram Waghmare & Another
Versus
Western Coalfields Ltd.
FIRST APPEAL NO.285 OF 1996 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.119, 142, 325, 326, 335, 341, 373, 390, 391, 414, 415, 417, 547, 557, 428, 429 AND 370 OF 1998
Decided on : 23-09-2009

Advocates appeared:
Shri W.G.Charde, Advocate for the appellants in all the Appeals. Shri R.Darda, Advocate for the respondent in F.A. No.285/06. Shri M.Anilkumar, Advocate for the respondent in F.A. Nos.119, 342, 335, 341, 390, 417, 547 and 429/98. Shri S.C.Mehadia, Advocate for the respondent in F.A. No.142, 414, 415, 557 and 428/98. Shri M.P.Badar, Advocate for the respondent in F.A. No.391/98. None for the respondent in F.A. Nos.373 and 370/98.

Headnote:Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act (20 of 1957)-Sections 17(3), 9 and 10-Delay in payment of compensation for land acquired-Accrual of interest-Owner is entitled to claim interest from the date of notification till receipt of amount of compensation. (Paras 7 and 8)

       

Judgment :

ORAL JUDGMENT

All these appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment since the question involved in these appeals is identical.

2.The owners, whose land has been acquired under Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development Act), 1957, have come up in appeal.

3.The facts are as follows -

The land of all the appellants has been acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas Act. Notification under Section 4 of the Act for the acquisition was issued in 1990 and Notification under Section 9 was issued in the year 1995. The Land Acquisition Officer under the Act determined the compensation. Since the compensation awarded was found to be inadequate, a reference was sought to the Tribunal constituted under the Coal Bearing Areas Act. The Tribunal enhanced the compensation. Different amount of compensation was determined in respect of each claimant. The claimants, however, feel aggrieved by the fact that the Tribunal had awarded inadequate compensation and had not awarded interest under Section 17(3) of the Act.

4.I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondent.

5.Learned counsel for the appellant, however, restricted his submission with regard to the interest payable under Section 17(3) of the Act and the date from which it is payable. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, that is not challenged.

6.Shri Charde, learned counsel for the appellants submits that each of the claimants was entitled to interest on the amount of compensation from the date of Notification under Section 9 of the Act till the date of actual payment of the compensation or deposit of the same. Shri Mehadia, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent is not bound to pay any interest since the possession is not delivered to the respondent. He submits that interest can be awarded only when respondent takes possession and does not pay the compensation.

7.In the context, Sections 9 and 10 of the Coal Bearing Areas Act will have to be looked into. Section 9 and 10 reads as follows -

"9.(1) When the Central Government is satisfied, after considering the report, if any, made under section 8 that any land or any rights in or over such land should be acquired, a declaration shall be made by it to that effect ( and different declarations may be made from time to time in respect of different parcels of any land, or of rights in or over such land, covered by the same notification under sub-section (1) of section 7, irrespective of whether one report or different reports has or have been made (wherever required) under sub-section (2) of Section 8) :

(Provided that no declaration in respect of any particulars land, or rights in or over such land, covered by a notification under sub-section (1) of Section 7, issued after the commencement of the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development) Amendment and Validation Act, 1971, shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the said notification :

(Provided further that, where a declaration) relates to any land or to any rights in or over land belonging to a State Government which has or have not been leased out, no such declaration shall be made except after previous consultation with the State Government.

(2) (Every declaration) shall be published in the Official Gazette, and-

(a) in any case where land is to be acquired, shall state the district or other territorial division in which the land is situate and its approximate area; and, where a plan shall have been made of the land, the place where such plan may be inspected;

(b) in any case where rights in or over such land are to be acquired, shall state the nature and extent of the rights in addition to the matters relating to the land specified in clause (a); and a copy of every such declaration shall be sent to the State Government concerned."

"10.(1) On the publication in the official Gazette of the declaration under section 9, the land or the rights in or over the land, as the case may be, sha






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top