A.S.OKA
PERCIVAL JOSEPH PAREIRA – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent
The submissions of the learned counsel for the parties were heard on 7th October, 2009. The judgment was reserved. Accordingly, the petition is today placed for judgment.
2. This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arises out of the proceedings of a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act of 1894"). The petitioner is the claimant in the said reference. By the impugned order, the third respondent (The City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited hereinafter referred to as "CIDCO") has been directed to be added as an opponent to the land acquisition reference under section 18 of the said Act of 1894.
3. A reference will have to be made to the facts of the case. The notification under section 4 of the said Act of 1894 in respect of the acquired land was issued on 24th September, 1986. The declaration under section 6 of the said Act of 1894 was issued on 17th September, 1987. After the award dated 18th September 1989 was made, an application under section 18 of the said Act of 1894 was filed by the petitioner on the basis of which a reference under section 18 of the said ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.