S.A.BOBDE, S.J.KATHAWALLA
X – Appellant
Versus
Y – Respondent
S. A. BOBDE, J. :-
The appellant - husband has preferred Family Court Appeal No. 48 of 2006 against the judgment and order of the IInd Family Court at Bandra, which allowed the respondent - wife's petition for divorce (Petition No. A-436/1999) on the ground of cruelty and dissolved the marriage between the parties. The learned trial Court had consequently dismissed the petition filed by the appellant, after the petition for divorce was instituted against him, for restitution of conjugal rights (Petition No. A-624/1999). The learned counsel for the appellant has stated before us that he is not pressing the appeal against the dismissal of the said petition, viz., Family Court Appeal No. 49 of 2006, for restitution of conjugal rights. Accordingly, Family Court Appeal No. 49 of 2006 stands disposed of as not pressed.
2. The parties were married on 17-4-1998 in Mumbai. They cohabited for a period of 45 days. Apparently, the respondent left the appellant's company on 3-6-1998, due to the cruel treatment he meted out to her, and the parties have not cohabited ever since. With a view to see if a settlement or reconciliation was possible, at this stage, we interviewed the partie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.