SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 192

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Mustafa Surka – Appellant
Versus
Jay Ambe Enterprise – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri. Ashok P. Mundargi, Sr. Counsel with Shri. S.V. Marwadi and Shri. Niranjan Mundargi i/by. Mr. Jayant Bardeskar, Mr. Hrishikesh A. Mundargi, M. Bhakti Deshpande, Ms. Swapna Kode, Ms. Vishranti Navale, Adv. For Applicant.
Mrs. Pravina Kanani and Ms. Vidya Dongra, Advs. For Respondent No.1.
Smt. R.V. Newton, APP for State-Respondent No. 2 in Cri. Applin No. 4434/2009
Smt. P.P. Bhosale, APP for State-Respondent No. 2 in Cri. Appln. No. 4435/2009 till 4440/2009.
Smt. S.V. Gajare, APP for State-Respondent No. 2 in Cri. Appln. No. 4441/2009 till 4443/2009 and Cri. Appln. No. 4452/2009 till 4456/2009.
Shri. D.R. More, APP for State-Respondent No.2 in Cri. Appln. No. 4457/2009 till 4460/2009

JUDGMENT:- In all these matters, the common question that has been raised is "Whether a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, is maintainable when the complainant receives an intimation of dishonour from the banker of the drawer to the effect that "the signature of the drawer does not tally" or the remarks of the bankers are "Drawers signature differs from the specimen signature ?"."

2. In other words, when the Negotiable Instruments Act and more particularly Section 138 thereof permits filing of a complaint alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act on the ground that the dishonour of cheque is for insufficiency etc. of the funds is such a complaint tenable or the words are restrictive in nature, hence not capable of a wide meaning. Thus, assuming that the substantive provision is restrictive, yet, considering the title of the section in question, whether a complaint can be filed under Section 138 even if the endorsement or bankers slip is to the afore mentioned effect.

3. The facts in Criminal Application No. 4434 of 2009 need be noted for the purpose of appreciating the rival contentions. The first-respondent complainant filed a complaint bef


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top