SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Bom) 350

N.M.JAMDAR
Shantilal Walchand Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Shantabai Purushottam Deshmukh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S. and S.A. Bhobde and T.T. Anthony, for Petitioner:J.N. Chandurkar, for Respondent No. 1.

ORDER:- This is tenant's petition challenging the appellate order in rent control proceedings commenced on an application under Clause 13 (3) of the C. C. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rent Control Order'), maintaining the order of the Rent Controller granting permission to respondent No. 1 landlady under Clause 13 (3) (iii) of the Rent Control order to terminate petitioner's tenancy on the ground of subletting.

2. Respondent No. 1 landlady filed an application under Clause 13 (3) (ii) and (iii) of the Rent Control Order for permission to terminate petitioner's tenancy on the grounds that the petitioner was a habitual defaulter in payment of rent and that he unauthorisedly created sub-tenancy in favour of one Pandurang Gulabrao Deshmukh, since deceased, whose legal representatives are present respondents Nos. 2 to 5. The Rent Controller held that the petitioner was a habitual defaulter and that he inducted a sub-tenant without written permission of the landlady, and consequently granted permission on both the counts. In an appeal preferred by the petitioner, the Resident Deputy Collector with appellate powers set aside the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top