SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 521

G.D.KAMAT, M.S.VAIDYA
Prakash Anand Pednekar – Appellant
Versus
Sitabai R. Gawas – Respondent


Advocates:
S.D. Lotlikar, for Appellant; M.P. Mulgaokar (for No.3), for Respondents.

Judgement

KAMAT, J.:- Sitabai R. Gawas, respondent No.1, succeeded in Claim Petition No.4/87 filed by her before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panaji, by getting an Award dated 31st December, 1991, in her favour. That award directed that she be paid a sum of Rs. 85,000/- as and by way of compensation in respect of the death caused to her husband in a vehicular accident in which mini bus bearing registration No. GDS-2272 was involved, which belonged to the present appellant and was insured with the third respondent.

2. The Tribunal in the impugned award held that out of the amount of compensation awarded, the liability of the third respondent-insurer, is limited to Rs. 15,000/- only, that being the limit of the liability per passenger in an accident, in terms of Section 95(2)(b)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and the remaining amount is directed to be paid by the present appellant/owner and respondent No.2, the driver.

3. The appellant/owner of the minibus challenges the impugned Award restricted to one challenge that the deceased husband of respondent No.1 was not a passenger and therefore not covered under Section 95(2)(b)(ii) and it is a pure case of involvement of third


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top