DHARMADHIKARI
Minoti – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Mohansingh Malik – Respondent
2. It appears to be an admitted position that defendant No.1 Sushilkumar was prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Penal Code in Sessions Case No.196 of 1980 decided on 29th of Oct., 1980. After appreciating all the evidence on record the Sessions Court came to the conclusion that accused Sushilkumar used a sharp-edged weapon for inflicting various injuries on deceased Revati. While inflicting the injuries he chose vital part of the body and used considerable force. The Sessions Court further found that in view of the number of injuries and their location considered together with other factors clearly indicate that accused Sushilkumar did the act with intention of causing the death of Revati. After reco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.