SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Bom) 42

VAIDYA
Gopal Khandu Wani – Appellant
Versus
Vasta Ramsing Fasepardhi – Respondent


Advocates:
R.V. Desai, for Appellant; M.D. Angal, for Respondents.

JUDGEMENT :- The above Second Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Assistant Judge, Dhulia, dated June 11, 1976 by which the learned Assistant Judge refused to interfere with the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhulia, on September 30, 1972, in Regular Darkhast No. 46 of 1972, filed by the decree-holder for recovery of Rs. 3,018,78/- under the decree passed on January 26, 1971, in Regular Civil Suit No. 348 of 1969.

2. The only point which was raised by the judgement-debtor was that his liability in respect of the decretal debt was extinguished under the provisions of the Maharashtra Debt Relief Act 1975 and the Maharashtra Debt Relief Rules 1975, with effect from August 22, 1975 and the decree was, therefore, in-executable.

3. The point was not raised before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division; but was raised for the first time in appeal, which appears to have been filed and entertained in the year 1976. The learned Assistant Judge came to the conclusion that the Debt Relief Act did not apply as it was a decree in respect of the claim arising out of a contract which was a transaction not connected with the money-lending within the meanin







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top