SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Bom) 165

GINWALA
Bhaurao Shamrao Bhalme – Appellant
Versus
Mahadeo Raghu Yelekar – Respondent


Advocates:
W.G. Deo, for Appellants; P.N. Karekar, for Respondent.

JUDGEMENT :- The appellants had brought a suit against the respondent for specific performance of a contract of sale of a field admeasuring 10 acres for a consideration of Rs. 400/-. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court and the first appellate Court confirmed the said decree. It is against the decree of the first appellate Court that this appeal has been filed.

2. Shortly stated the case of the appellants was that on 27th May 1961 the respondent had contracted to sell the suit field to one Narayanrao for a consideration of Rs. 400/- out of which he received Rs. 225/- as earnest money and executed an agreement in this respect. Under the terms of the agreement the sale was to be completed on Chaitra Sudha 15 Shake 1371 which corresponds to 19th April 1962, by Narayanrao paying the balance of the consideration of Rs. 175/- and obtaining the sale deed by remaining present in the office of the Sub-Registrar. The appellants alleged that the respondent did not perform his part of the contract. Though Narayan was ready and willing to do so and called upon the respondent by his notice dated 25th June 1962 to complete the sale, the respondent avoided to do so and refused to execute the s

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top