VAIDYA
Keshavji Ramji Sanghavi – Appellant
Versus
Sulochanabai Ramkrishna Mirwankar – Respondent
2. The learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thana, held in the suit for eviction, filed by the landlord in his judgrnent and decree, dated March 31, 1970, that the tenant had removed an old beam ridden with termite and refixed a new one; and this would not be an act contrary to the provisions of Clause (o) of S.108 of the Transfer of Property Act; and, therefore, dismissed the plaintiff's suit.
3. The learned Joint Judge reversed that decision holding :-
"The act of the defendant in removing the old beam from its place was nothing but destructive or permanently injurious to the suit premises, irrespective of the fact whether actual damage was caused to the building or not. There is also some evidence of damage caused to the plaintiff's house. I, therefore, feel that the defendant's act of removing the old beam from its place was contrary to the provisions o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.