SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Bom) 237

DHARMADHIKARI
Rupam Pictures – Appellant
Versus
Brijmohan – Respondent


Advocates:
V.R. Manohar, for Applicants; M.B. Mor and S.C. Mehadia, for Opponent No.1.

ORDER :- Opponent No.1 Brijmohan filed an application under S.20 of the Arbitration Act against the applicants as well as opponents Nos.2 to 5 contending that the original opponents had entered into an agreement with him on 24-11-1965 whereunder he had advanced an amount of Rs. 26,250/- to the opponents on the terms and conditions enumerated therein. Further, according to him, as the opponents failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement, vide registered notice dated 11-11-1967 he asked them to pay an amount of Rs. 31,885.86 as dues on account of his business commission. Vide reply dated 27-9-1968 the opponents contended that the entire dues were pai dto his father and as no business was done for the concerned pictures for November 1967 onwards, nothing more was payable to him. Therefore, as according to opponent Brijmohan, a dispute or a difference had arisen between the parties, to which the arbitration agreement applied, he filed an application under S.20 of the Arbitration Act. The application in that behalf was filed on 2-1-1971.

2. The opponents to the original application opposed the said application on various grounds. They also contended that the applicat









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top