DESHPANDE, REGE
Jhaman Karamsingh Dadlani – Appellant
Versus
Ramanlal Maneklal Kantawala, Chief Justice of High Court, Bombay – Respondent
DESHPANDE, J. :- The petitioner, an advocate of this Court, seeks to challenge the validity of Rules 35 and 623 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1957, in this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on the around of the said Rules being violative of Articles 14 and 19 thereof as also the provisions of the Advocates Act. 1961. A writ directing Union Government to enforce Section 30 of the said Act also is sought. This petition was lodged and received at the Appellate Side. Notice before admission was directed to be issued by Vaidya and Dudhia JJ. to the respondents and certain other interested institutions, in view of the importance of the points raised, when the matter was placed for admission on 9th July 1973. The petition has been placed before us for admission, on the appearance of the respondents, etc., as per order of the learned Chief Justice. Regular Bench for constitutional matters could not hear it earlier due to an objection raised by Mr. Desai that one of the learned Judges was a member of the delegation opposing such Rules. The learned Advocate General and Mr. Ashok Desai raised a preliminary objection to the competency o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.