SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Bom) 93

JOSHI
Vishwas Balu – Appellant
Versus
Ghasiram Ramratan Jajum – Respondent


Advocates:
M.V. Sali with J.R. Lalit, for Petitioners; Bhimrao N. Naik (for No. 1) and V.V. Karmarker (for No. 2), for Opponents.

ORDER :- The petitioners who are the legal representatives of the original tenant Balkrishna Jagtap, have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the decree made by the learned District Judge, Sholapur, in Civil Appeal No. 380 of 1969 on affirming that of the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Barsi, in Regular Civil Suit No. 41 of 1968.

2. The few facts necessary for the disposal of the application could be briefly stated thus : The property in dispute is C. T. S. No. 2514 situate on the Station Road at Barsi in District Sholapur. The original defendant No. 1, since deceased, had taken it on lease for a period of eleven months under a rent note Ex. 53 dated 17th December 1960. The rent agreed upon was Rs. 25 per month. Respondent No. 1 landlord terminated the tenancy of the tenant by a notice dated 2nd August 1967 and claimed possession mainly on the ground of default in payment of rent from March 1966 to July 1967, change in the user of the premises leased out, erection of permanent structures which were about three in number, and taking a water pipe connection without the landlord's consent, obtained in writing, and unlawful sub-letting.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top