SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 736

N.A.BRITTO
Engineers Combine – Appellant
Versus
Goa State Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri. C. MASCARENHAS, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri. S. BANDODKAR, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Shri. D. PANGAM, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT:- Rule. By consent heard forthwith.

2. The Petitioner herein is the plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 3/2008.

3. This petition is directed against Order dated 8-10-2008 of the learned District Judge-4, Margao by which a preliminary issue framed in the suit has been decided against the plaintiff.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top