SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 747

2010(4) ALL MR 626
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY (AURANGABAD BENCH)
A. M. KHANWILKAR & S. S. SHINDE, JJ.
Sunil Pandharinath Jadhav
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Writ Petition No.546 of 2006 10th June, 2010.

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. F. R. TANDALE, Advocate appointed as amicus curiae.
Mr. N. B. KHANDARE, GP for Respondent No.1.
Mr. S. N. PAGARE, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

Headnote:Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 244 and 245 - Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation (Control or Advertising or Hoarding) Rules, 2003, Rule 4 - Writ petition (P.I.L.) - Seeking direction to Corporation to enforce complete ban to put up any hoarding/ board on public roads, medians/chowks - Held - Commissioner as well as Collector directed to take necessary steps to explore possibility of constituting "Nodal Authority" - Corporation as well as State duty bound to ensure that illegal posters/banners/hoardings or boards not displayed in city or any public road or property or place - If any such illegal action noticed that to be removed at earliest opportunity - Action to be taken against concerned persons for recovery of appropriate charges or fine including initiation of prosecution - Petition disposed of. - Hope and trust the necessary steps will be taken by the Commissioner of the Corporation as well as the Collector Aurangabad to explore the possibility of constituting a "Nodal Authority" for granting consolidated permission for display of posters/banners/hoardings or boards. In any case, sees no difficulty as to why the different authorities responsible to remove the illegal posters/banners/ hoardings cannot consider of constituting one "Nodal Agency" for taking steps for effective implementation of the scheme to remove the illegal posters/banners/ hoardings or boards throughout the city and to ensure that no such illegal poster/ banner/hoarding or broad is displayed through out the city.

Judgment

A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.:- The Petitioner, claiming to be a resident of Aurangabad city, has filed this writ petition in public interest. He has sought directions against the Respondents, amongst other, that the Respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation be directed that henceforth the Corporation shall enforce complete ban to put up any hoarding/board on the guard rails (Kathada) at Kranti Chowk. Further, the Corporation shall not permit display of hoarding/board of any political party for more than one day on public roads, medians/squares (Chowks). It is further prayed that mandatory order be passed prohibiting display of hoarding/board congratulating for the success or giving best wishes to anyone on the eve of his/her birthday in public places; and to direct the Commissioner Aurangabad to take appropriate strict penal action against every person and political party or association, indulging in defacement of public property. This Petition was moved in February, 2006. During the pendency of this Petition, the Respondents have filed affidavits and also action taken reports from time to time. The Petition has now been finally heard. As a result, we propose to dispose of this Petition by the present order.

2. Broadly, the controversy raised in this Petition is in relation to the display of illegal hoardings/banners/posters/temporary arches in the city of Aurangabad, without taking prior permission of the concerned authority; and moreso, in public places and on roads causing obstruction to traffic and defacement of the public property. It also causes public nuisance and are eyesore to the viewer. To espouse the cause of the Petitioner. Mr. F. R. Tandale was appointed as an amicus curiae. He alongwith the counsel appearing for the Corporation have submitted action plan to eschew the display of such illegal hoardings/banners/posters in public places in the city for felicitation mostly of political leaders on their birthday, success or about their arrival in the city. The counsel for the Corporation has taken a very fair stand that illegal hoardings/posters not only cause obstruction to the traffic, but also affect the beauty of the city and more importantly causes financial loss to the Corporation. Inasmuch as, there are around 329 identified approved spots to display advertisement within the limits of Municipal Corporation. Aurangabad. Steel frames have been fixed permanently on the said spots, which are meant to support hoardings. The structure so put up has been certified by the City Engineer. The hoardings are fixed on the said steel frames with care so that no accident should be caused. For display of such hoardings, the Corporation receives charges as prescribed by the General Body in its resolution dated 25th September, 2006. It is fairly accepted on behalf of the Corporation that the rates so prescribed, would require revision on account of passage of time. It is stated that a proposal will be submitted for consideration for revision of the said rates to the General Body in due course of time. Indeed, what rate should be prescribed for display of advertisement by way of hoardings/boards/posters etc. is the prerogative of the Corporation. Since the Corporation is inclined to revise the prevailing rates, we refrain from making any further observation in that regard.

3. It is not in dispute that no hoardings/boards/posters can be put up in public places and more particularly on roads without seeking prior permission of the Corporation. Section 244 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1949" for the sake of brevity) makes provision regarding sky signs and advertisements. Section 245 of the Act of 1949 provides for regulation and control of the advertisements. The said provisions read thus :

"244. (1) No person shall, without the written permission of the Commissioner, erect, fix or retain any sky-sign of the kind prescribed by rules whether exis














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top