F. I. REBELLO, J.:- The petitioner was served with a charge-sheet in terms of the Bank of Baroda Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the Appeal Regulations") alleging major mis-conducts. What constitutes 'major misconduct' is set out under the provisions of the Bank of Baroda Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the Conduct Regulations"). Regulation 3 sets out generally what an Officer should do in the course of his employment. Regulation 24 of the Conduct Regulations sets out that a breach of any of the provisions of the Regulations shall be deemed to constitute a mis-conduct punishable under the Appeal Regulations. Petitioner replied to the charge-sheet. An inquiry was conducted. The Inquiry Officer submitted his report and held in terms of his findings as recorded in the inquiry report, that in respect of some of the items they were not proved and the other charges were proved. The Disciplinary Authority by his communication of 10th March, 2000 informed the petitioner that he disagreed with the findings of the Inquiry officer and annexed a copy of the order as to why he disagreed