SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 898

S.A.BOBDE, A.B.CHAUDHARI
Sudhir s/o. Sharadrao Hunge – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri. A. S. CHANDURKAR, Adv. for Petitioners.
AGP for Respdt. No.1.
Shri. B. G. KULKARNI, Adv. for Respdt. No.2.

JUDGMENT

A. B. CIIAUDHARI, J.:-Heard. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the rival parties.

2. All these writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment and order in view of the common question of law involved therein. The question of law that falls for consideration is as under:

Whether introduction of NET/SLET as eligibility condition for recruitment and appointment of Lecturers in Universities/ Colleges/Institutions as per Gazette Notification dated 11.7.2009 prescribed by University Grants Commission (UGC) will affect the selections and appointments made in accordance with the approved advertisements/notifications published before 11.7.2009 when the eligibility condition was not compulsory NET/SLET?

3. For convenience, following details in the form of chart are reproduced, which are relevant for the purpose of decision in these writ petitions.

Sr. Writ Petition Name Date of Date of

No. No. advertisement appointment

(1) (2) (3) (4)



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top