SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Bom) 898

2010(5) ALL MR 79
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH)
S. A. BOBDE & A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
Sudhir s/o. Sharadrao Hunge & Am.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Writ Petition Nos. 1489, 1935, 1719, 1725, 1940, 2014 to 2016, 2088 to 2091, 2093 to 2097, 2116, 2129, 2211, 2212, 2413, 2084, 503 of 2010 and 5197, 5209 of 2009 2nd July, 2010.

Advocates Appeared:
Shri. A. S. CHANDURKAR, Adv. for Petitioners.
AGP for Respdt. No.1.
Shri. B. G. KULKARNI, Adv. for Respdt. No.2.

Headnote:A) University Grants Commission Act (1956), S.56 - University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications required for the Appointment and Career Advancement of teachers in Universities and Institutions affiliated to it) Regulations (1991), Regn.2 (as amended by 2nd Amendment of 2006):- Mandatory requirement of NET/SLET for appointment as lecturers in degree colleges made by the notification by the UGC is only prospective and does not in any way affect appointments in pursuance of advertisements prior to the notification.

JUDGMENT

A. B. CIIAUDHARI, J.:-Heard. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the rival parties.

2. All these writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment and order in view of the common question of law involved therein. The question of law that falls for consideration is as under:

Whether introduction of NET/SLET as eligibility condition for recruitment and appointment of Lecturers in Universities/ Colleges/Institutions as per Gazette Notification dated 11.7.2009 prescribed by University Grants Commission (UGC) will affect the selections and appointments made in accordance with the approved advertisements/notifications published before 11.7.2009 when the eligibility condition was not compulsory NET/SLET?

3. For convenience, following details in the form of chart are reproduced, which are relevant for the purpose of decision in these writ petitions.

Sr. Writ Petition Name Date of Date of

No. No. advertisement appointment

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

01. 1489/10 Sudhir s/o. Sharadrao Hunge + 1 25.06.2009 14.09.2009

02. 1935/10 Ku. Pramila D/o. Domaji Bhoyar 29.06.2009 29.07.2009

03. 1719/10 Anil s/o. Gangaram Dodewar 05.03.2009 17.07.2009

04. 1725/10 Raju s/o. Laxman Ade 04.07.2009 04.11.2009

05. 1940/10 Mrs. Pournima w/o. Housilal Rahangdale 23.05.2009 15.07.2009

06. 2014/10 Arvind s/o. Daulat Borkar + 3 19.03.2009 31.07.2009/

03.08.2009/ 29.07.2009/ 08.08.2009

07. 2015/10 Mrs. Arti w/o. Baburao Padole 15.06.2009 20.07.2009

08. 2016/10 Manmohan s/o. Suryabhan Bhaisare + 6 29.06.2009 31.07.2009/

03.08.2009/

29.07.2009/

08.08.2009

09. 2088/10 Ms. Bhagyashree Shridharrao Gawate 30.05.2009 22.07.2009

10. 2089/10 Ku. Smita d/o. Ganesh Ambade 29.05.2008 05.08.2009/

and another 10.08.2009

11. 2090/10 Tikaram s/o. Dayaram Samrit 02.06.2009 03.08.2009

12. 2091/10 Sanjay s/o. Bachchesaheb Deshmukh + 2 14.05.2009 25.08.2009/

16.07.2009/

17.07.2009

13. 2093/10 Najukram s/o. Dinanath Bankar 04.06.2009 19.08.2009

14. 2094/10 Ku. Shectal Ramdas Gomkar 23.04.2009 24.07.2009

15. 2095/10 Shrawan s/o. Baliram Kapgate + 3 25.06.2009 22.07.2009

16. 2096/10 Anant s/o. Atmaram Rindhe 07.06.2009 03.08.2009

17. 2097/10 Ashok s/o. Ramdasji Salame 15.06.2009 20.07.2009

18. 2116/10 Anup s/o. Vinayakrao Gumblc 06.07.2009 23.08.2009

19. 2129/10 Ashwin s/o. Shivcharan Meshram 25.06.2009 22.07.2009

20. 2211/10 Anand s/o. Gurnomal Thadani 05.07.2009 20.07.2009

21. 2212/10 Ms. Reema d/o. Khialdas Kamlani 05.07.2009 03.09.2009

22. 2413/10 Ajit s/o. Venkateshrao Khajgiwale 04.07.2009 04.11.2009

23. 5197/09 Sunil s/o. Gajananrao Dhakulkar 22.06.2009 10.08.2009

24. 5209/09 Prakash s/o. Dhondiba Shrungare 22.06.2009 17.08.2009

25. 503/10 Gajanan s/o. Bhaurao Jangale 22.06.2009 18.08.2009

26. 2084/10 Gajanan s/o. Shyam sundar Raut 14.05.2009 25.08.2009

4. In all me above writ petitions from serial Nos.1 to 25, advertisements were approved by the respondent - University before their publication on the respective dates mentioned in the above chart.

5. In Writ Petition No.2084/20 10 i.e. at serial No.26 in the above chart, advertisement was firstly published on 14.5.2009 after its approval from the University for the post indicated in the said advertisement. However, since qualified candidate was not available, fresh advertisement was issued on 20.7.2009 i.e. after cut-off date, namely, 11.7.2009 Fact, however, remains that the second advertisement was issued pursuant to the said approval of the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top