C.L.PANGARKAR
BHAGWANT SHESHRAO BORALE – Appellant
Versus
EDUCATION OFFICER – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this writ petition the petitioner a teacher challenges the order passed by the Education Officer holding respondents 4 and 5 to be senior to the petitioner. ( 2 ) THE facts are as follows: petitioner was appointed as a Assistant Teacher in the school run by respondent no. 2 for the academic session 1995-96 vide order dated 14. 1. 1996. The Education Officer had sanctioned one additional section each for Standard 5 to 7. As per the staff approval sanctioned by the Education Officer, there were in all 6 classes of Standard 5 to 7 in the school run by respondent No. 2. Petitioner submits that as per Government policy, teachers at ratio 1 : 3 are admissible for one class of Standard 5 to 7. Taking into account the ratio of the admissible teachers in these classes Education Officer had sanctioned 8 lower division teachers for Standard 5 to 7. By Order dated 9. 10. 1996 the education Officer granted approval for the academic sessions 1996-97. In fact two posts of trained graduate teachers in 25% quota are admissible for standard 5 to 7 as can be conveniently gathered from the said approval. The total number of graduate under graduate teachers admissible to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.